Business Operations Audit

How Sterling & Reeve can absorb four more projects a year without hiring.

A workflow audit of the studio's client-onboarding, sourcing, deliverables, and admin processes — with a costed roadmap to recover 33 hours of principal time per week.

Prepared for
Eleanor Sterling, Founder
Studio
Sterling & Reeve Interiors
Prepared by
Finn Harris · Harris Automations
Audit window
14 days · concluded 06 May 2026
Executive summary

The bottleneck isn't design — it's the 11 manual handoffs between booking a client and shipping the spec pack.

Across two weeks of shadowing and stack review we identified 33.5 hours of weekly admin time that adds zero design value. Most of it is concentrated in three places: proposal turnaround, vendor sourcing reconciliation, and the weekly client-update loop.

Removing the bottleneck is a six-week build on tools the studio already pays for, plus one lightweight middleware layer. Modelled honestly, it pays back inside the first additional project — by month four.

0hrs
Reclaimed per week, principal & junior combined
0extra
Projects/yr absorbable at current team size
£0k
Modelled incremental annual revenue
0×
Year-one return on build investment
01 · Subject

Studio overview.

A founder-led, design-forward studio operating in the upper-mid residential bracket with a stable book and a clear growth ceiling.

Studio
Sterling & Reeve Interiors
Founded 2017 · Notting Hill, London. Founder + 3 designers + 1 PM. Studio dog: Hugo.
Client profile
UHNW residential
Avg project fee £85k · 4–6 month design phase · referral-led acquisition (~70%).
Annual revenue
£1.19M (FY25)
14 active projects this year · capacity ceiling cited by founder as the limiting factor on intake.
Current stack
Dubsado · Notion · Houzz Pro · Mailchimp · Gmail
Tools paid for, partly used. Several integrations stalled mid-setup; Studio uses Notion as the source of truth in practice.
Hours worked / wk
62 (founder)
Of which ~37 hrs are non-design: client comms, sourcing chase, proposal turnaround, supplier admin, invoicing follow-up.
Stated goal
Take on Project #15 + #16
Without hiring, without compromising bespoke quality, and without working past 10pm Sundays.
02 · Methodology

How the audit was conducted.

Two weeks. Five stages. Read-only access to live tooling, two shadow sessions, one deep founder interview. No-one was asked to explain anything they didn't already know.

01

Kickoff & scope

30-min call. Mapped the studio's revenue model, headcount, and the founder's three biggest weekly complaints.

02

Read-only access

Reviewed Dubsado, Notion, Houzz Pro, the shared Gmail, and twelve months of project P&L's in read-only mode.

03

Shadow sessions

Two 90-min observations: one full proposal turnaround end-to-end, and one client weekly-update loop start to finish.

04

Founder interview

75-min recorded interview with Eleanor. Walked through every tool, every recurring task, every recent dropped ball.

05

Synthesis

Time-leak analysis, priority ranking by ROI, draft of recommended system, costed roadmap. This document.

03 · Current state

Where the work actually goes.

From the moment a referral lands to the moment a client signs off the spec pack, the studio touches the project across five tools and 11 manual handoffs. Red lines are wholly manual; amber are semi-automated; green are already automated.

Client journey · referral → signed spec pack

Inbound Referral · IG DM Discovery call Cal link · Zoom Proposal draft 5–9 days · manual Send proposal Dubsado · email Sign & deposit Dubsado · auto Mood board Concept · review Sourcing 9 hrs/wk · spread Spec sheets Excel · manual Client update Weekly · manual Approval loop Email threads PO & deposit Vendors · email Spec pack Bespoke · final Sign-off Auto · invoice
Manual handoff Semi-automated Already automated
04 · Time-leak analysis

Where 33.5 non-design hours per week disappear.

Hours captured from two weeks of timesheet data plus the founder interview. Sourcing, proposal turnaround, and the client-update loop alone account for 65% of the leak.

Sourcing & vendor chase
9.0 hrs
Proposal turnaround
7.5 hrs
Weekly client-update loop
5.5 hrs
Spec sheet reconciliation
4.0 hrs
Inbox triage & chasing
3.5 hrs
PO / deposit admin
2.5 hrs
Invoice follow-up
1.5 hrs
05 · Findings

Seven specific leverage points.

Ranked by recoverable hours per week × likelihood of clean automation. Severity is the cost of leaving it untouched, not the difficulty of fixing it.

F-01 High

Proposal turnaround is the #1 close-rate lever — and it's averaging 7 days.

Discovery → signed proposal currently runs 5–9 days. Industry benchmark for studios closing at this fee point is <48 hrs. Founder confirmed: when a proposal goes out same-day, close rate >75%; when it slips past day 3, drop-off is steep.

Time leak
7.5 hrs / wk
Close-rate impact
~12% lift estimated
F-02 High

Vendor sourcing is happening across 4 inboxes, 2 spreadsheets, and Houzz Pro favourites.

No single source of truth. Each project rebuilds its own short-list from scratch; ~40% of vendor lookups duplicate work the studio has already done on past projects. Hugo (the dog) has, in fairness, never lost a sourcing email.

Time leak
9.0 hrs / wk
Hidden cost
Re-sourcing on £20k+ items
F-03 High

The weekly client update is rebuilt from scratch every Friday afternoon.

Eleanor and the PM each spend ~45 min per active project assembling progress notes, photo updates, and supplier status into a bespoke email. Most of the underlying data already exists in Notion — it's the assembly that costs.

Time leak
5.5 hrs / wk
Quality risk
Skipped in busy weeks
F-04 Medium

Dubsado and Notion are not talking — the same client lives in two places.

Dubsado is the contractual record; Notion is the working record. Updates to one don't reach the other. Status in Dubsado was out-of-date on 4 of 7 active projects we sampled.

Time leak
2.0 hrs / wk
Risk
Contract drift
F-05 Medium

Spec sheets are rebuilt in Excel each project — not generated from the sourcing record.

Once a vendor is locked, its details should flow straight into the spec pack. Today they're re-typed, often from scratch, and the SKU numbers don't always match the PO that gets sent.

Time leak
4.0 hrs / wk
Error rate
~6% PO mismatches
F-06 Medium

Inbound enquiries are not being qualified before they reach the founder's inbox.

~30% of discovery calls are clearly out-of-scope by minute three (budget under £30k, timeline mismatched, project type the studio doesn't take). A short pre-call form would deflect most of these without reading rude.

Time leak
2.5 hrs / wk
Calendar quality
Material lift
F-07 Low

Past-client referral asks are happening when Eleanor remembers — which is rarely.

70% of revenue is referral-led, but there's no trigger that asks a satisfied client for an introduction at the moment of sign-off. We modelled even a soft 25% take-up at one ask per completed project: roughly £180k of additional pipeline a year.

Pipeline upside
~£180k / yr
Effort to fix
Low · 1 trigger
06 · Recommended system

Four interconnected modules. One operating layer.

All four sit on top of the studio's existing tools. We don't add a new CRM. We make the ones you already pay for talk to each other and quietly pre-fill the work you'd otherwise do by hand.

1 · Same-day proposal generator

From discovery-call notes (auto-transcribed) to a ready-to-send branded proposal sitting in Eleanor's drafts within two hours. She edits a paragraph; it goes out the same day.

Fathom Claude API Dubsado Google Docs
7.5 hrs/wk reclaimed · close-rate uplift on top

2 · Single-source vendor library

Every vendor the studio has ever used, every quote received, every lead-time observed — searchable, taggable, photo-linked. New projects begin from a curated short-list, not a blank inbox search.

Notion DB n8n Houzz Pro sync Gmail parse
9 hrs/wk reclaimed · zero re-sourcing on repeat vendors

3 · Friday-morning client report

Every Friday at 8am, each active client gets a draft progress email pre-loaded with this week's photos, supplier ETAs, and outstanding decisions. Eleanor or the PM glance, edit one line, hit send.

Notion API Gmail Drive Modal cron
5.5 hrs/wk reclaimed · zero skipped weeks

4 · Referral-ask trigger

Sign-off in Dubsado fires a 14-day-later, hand-written-feeling email asking the client for a single warm intro. We ran the same trigger for an interior-design client last year — 17 warm conversations, 3 signed projects.

Dubsado Gmail Claude API
~£180k/yr modelled additional pipeline
07 · Roadmap

Six weeks, three phases.

Built incrementally so the studio sees value from week 2. Each phase ends with a working module live in production, documented, with a hand-off SOP.

Phase 01 · Weeks 1–2

Quick wins

First module live by day 10.
  • Pre-call qualifier form replacing free-text Cal link (F-06)
  • Referral-ask trigger wired to Dubsado sign-off (F-07)
  • Inbox triage rules: sourcing / clients / suppliers / signal
  • Weekly check-in cadence with Eleanor + PM established
Phase 02 · Weeks 3–4

Operating layer

The core middleware.
  • Vendor library DB built in Notion + populated from past 12 months (F-02)
  • Dubsado ⇄ Notion two-way sync via n8n (F-04)
  • Spec-sheet generation from sourcing record (F-05)
  • Friday client-report drafter wired up & piloting on 3 projects (F-03)
Phase 03 · Weeks 5–6

Proposal engine + handover

The biggest revenue lever, last so it lands on a stable base.
  • Same-day proposal generator from discovery-call transcript (F-01)
  • Branded template library + brand-voice training run on past 12 proposals
  • Full team training session + written SOP per module
  • 30-day fix window opens · weekly office-hours for tweaks
08 · Investment

Three options, fixed scope, no surprises.

All tiers include documentation, monitoring, written SOPs, and a 60-day fix window. Recommended is the full system as scoped above; the alternatives are if you want to start narrower or run lighter.

Targeted

Single module

£3,400 fixed
  • One module from the four scoped (F-01, F-02, F-03 or F-07)
  • 2-week build · live by week 3
  • SOP & training session
  • 30-day fix window
Ongoing

Operating partner

£1,500 / month
  • Iteration & tweaks on the live system
  • Quarterly roadmap review with founder
  • Priority bug response · Slack channel
  • Cancel any month · 30 days notice
09 · Return on investment

The honest payback maths.

Modelled on the Full System tier with conservative assumptions: only 3 of the modelled 4 extra projects materialise in year one, founder hourly value held flat at £180/hr, no upside applied to close-rate lift.

Build investment (one-off) £8,400
12 months operating partner £18,000
Tooling delta (n8n, Modal, API) £1,440
Reclaimed founder hours @ £180 +£42,120
3 additional projects @ £85k +£255,000
Referral pipeline uplift (modelled) +£60,000
Year-one net upside +£329,280
Modelled return on investment
0×
Year one. Conservative case. The break-even is the first additional project — by month four.
Payback in ~14 weeks

Ready to take Project #15?

If the recommendations land, the next step is a 30-minute scoping call to confirm Phase 01 scope, lock the start date, and put a deposit invoice in your inbox by end of day.